Heterotopic pregnancy – how easily you can go wrong in diagnosing? A case study

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Ultrasonography

Polish Ultrasound Society (Polskie Towarzystwo Ultrasonograficzne)

Subject: Medicine

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 2084-8404
eISSN: 2451-070X

DESCRIPTION

0
Reader(s)
0
Visit(s)

Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 75 (January 2018) > List of articles

Heterotopic pregnancy – how easily you can go wrong in diagnosing? A case study

Michał Ciebiera * / Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak / Kornelia Zaręba / Grzegorz Jakiel

Keywords : ectopic pregnancy, heterotopic pregnancy, twin pregnancy, ultrasound

Citation Information : Journal of Ultrasonography. Volume 18, Issue 75, Pages 355-358, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0052

License : (CC-BY-SA-4.0)

Received Date : 11-March-2018 / Accepted: 29-May-2018 / Published Online: 31-January-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Graphical ABSTRACT

Content not available Share

FIGURES & TABLES

Fig. 1.

Heterotopic pregnancy in ultrasound and during surgery. A. Scan at 11 weeks of gestation measuring the intrauterine fetus (different hospital). B. Scan at 11 weeks of gestation showing a “pseudo twin pregnancy” (different hospital). C. Ruptured right fallopian tube with the ectopic pregnancy during the surgery. D. Ruptured right fallopian tube with the ectopic pregnancy – after salpingectomy

REFERENCES

  1. Hassani KI, Bouazzaoui AE, Khatouf M, Mazaz K: Heterotopic pregnancy: A diagnosis we should suspect more often. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010; 3: 304.
    [CROSSREF]
  2. Wang PH, Chao HT, Tseng JY, Yang TS, Chang SP, Yuan CC et al.: Laparoscopic surgery for heterotopic pregnancies: A case report and a brief review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 80: 267–271.
    [CROSSREF]
  3. Fukuda T, Inoue H, Toyama Y, Ichida T, Uzawa Y, Monma M et al.: Bilateral tubal and intrauterine pregnancies diagnosed at laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 2114–2117.
    [CROSSREF]
  4. Korkontzelos I, Antoniou N, Stefos T, Kyparos I, Lykoudis S: Ruptured heterotopic pregnancy with successful obstetrical outcome: A case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2005; 32: 203–206.
    [PUBMED]
  5. Fatema N, Al Badi MM, Rahman M, Elawdy MM: Heterotopic pregnancy with natural conception; a rare event that is still being misdiagnosed: A case report. Clin Case Rep 2016; 4: 272–275.
    [CROSSREF]
  6. Jeon JH, Hwang YI, Shin IH, Park CW, Yang KM, Kim HO: The risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of 48 cases of heterotopic pregnancy from a single center. J Korean Med Sci 2016; 31: 1094–1099.
    [CROSSREF]
  7. Kirk E, Bottomley C, Bourne T: Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy and current concepts in the management of pregnancy of unknown location. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 250–261.
    [CROSSREF]
  8. Reece EA, Petrie RH, Sirmans MF, Finster M, Todd WD: Combined intrauterine and extrauterine gestations: A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 323–330.
    [CROSSREF]
  9. OuYang Z, Yin Q, Xu Y, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Yu Y: Heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1533–1537.
    [CROSSREF]
  10. Yu Y, Xu W, Xie Z, Huang Q, Li S: Management and outcome of 25 heterotopic pregnancies in Zhejiang, China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 180: 157–161.
    [CROSSREF]
  11. Tal J, Haddad S, Gordon N, Timor-Tritsch I: Heterotopic pregnancy after ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technologies: A literature review from 1971 to 1993. Fertil Steril 1996; 66: 1–12.
    [CROSSREF]
  12. Talbot K, Simpson R, Price N, Jackson SR: Heterotopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31: 7–12.
    [CROSSREF]
  13. Li XH, Ouyang Y, Lu GX: Value of transvaginal sonography in diagnosing heterotopic pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization with embryo transfer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 563–569.
    [CROSSREF]
  14. Barrenetxea G, Barinaga-Rementeria L, Lopez de Larruzea A, Agirregoikoa JA, Mandiola M, Carbonero K: Heterotopic pregnancy: Two cases and a comparative review. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 417. e9–417.e15.
  15. Li JB, Kong LZ, Yang JB, Niu G, Fan L, Huang JZ et al.: Management of heterotopic pregnancy: Experience from 1 tertiary medical center. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e2570.
    [CROSSREF]
  16. Lyu J, Ye H, Wang W, Lin Y, Sun W, Lei L et al.: Diagnosis and management of heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer: Clinical analysis of 55 cases from a single institution. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 85–92.
    [CROSSREF]
  17. Baxi A, Kaushal M, Karmalkar H, Sahu P, Kadhi P, Daval B: Successful expectant management of tubal heterotopic pregnancy. J Hum Reprod Sci 2010; 3: 108–110.
    [CROSSREF]
  18. Eom JM, Choi JS, Ko JH, Lee JH, Park SH, Hong JH et al.: Surgical and obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic management for women with heterotopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39: 1580–1586.
    [CROSSREF]
  19. Lang PF, Weiss PA, Mayer HO, Haas JG, Hönigl W: Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy with local injection of hyperosmolar glucose solution or prostaglandin-F2 alpha: A prospective randomised study. Lancet 1990; 336: 78–81.
    [CROSSREF]
  20. Goldstein JS, Ratts VS, Philpott T, Dahan MH: Risk of surgery after use of potassium chloride for treatment of tubal heterotopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (Pt 2): 506–508.
    [CROSSREF]
  21. Sijanovic S, Vidosavljevic D, Sijanovic I: Methotrexate in local treatment of cervical heterotopic pregnancy with successful perinatal outcome: case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011; 37: 1241–1245.
    [CROSSREF]

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS